iPhone SE (2016) • Unlocked vs iPhone XS • Unlocked

iPhone SE (2016) • Unlocked
iPhone SE (2016) • Unlocked
Starting at

Refurbished price:$70.00

Versus $219.00 new

See options
iPhone XS • Unlocked
iPhone XS • Unlocked
Starting at

Refurbished price:$128.00

Versus $459.00 new

See options

Ratings

The iPhone SE (2016) and the iPhone XS (2018) represent different eras in Apple's smartphone evolution. While both operate within the iOS ecosystem, they cater to distinct user preferences through their design and capabilities. The primary differentiators between these two models lie in their physical size, display technology, camera performance, and overall processing power. The iPhone SE (2016) has reached the end of its major operating system update cycle, whereas the iPhone XS continues to receive software support.

Scores

Durability

The longevity of a smartphone is influenced by its release timeline, software support, and physical resilience. The iPhone SE was released in March 2016, while the iPhone XS followed in September 2018, giving the XS a two-and-a-half-year advantage in its lifecycle.

  • Software Support: The iPhone SE (2016) concluded its major iOS updates with iOS 15.8.5, meaning it no longer receives new feature updates. In contrast, the iPhone XS, which launched with iOS 12, has received updates up to iOS 18, making it one of the longest-supported iPhones. However, it will not be compatible with iOS 26.
  • Repairability: Both the iPhone SE (2016) and the iPhone XS received a repairability score of 6 out of 10 from iFixit. The iPhone SE was noted for its relatively straightforward process for replacing common components.
  • Physical Durability: The iPhone SE (2016) features an aluminum back and frame with a glass front, but it lacks an official water resistance rating. The iPhone XS, built with a stainless steel frame and glass on both the front and back, boasts an IP68 rating, indicating resistance to dust and water submersion up to 2 meters for 30 minutes.

Release Year

2016

2018

Last OS Compatibility

No

Yes

OS

iOS

iOS

Foldable

No

No

Performance

The performance capabilities of these two devices reflect the advancements in mobile technology over their respective release periods.

  • Processing Power: The iPhone SE (2016) is equipped with an Apple A9 processor and 2GB of RAM. This configuration capably handles everyday tasks and less demanding applications. The iPhone XS, featuring the Apple A12 Bionic processor and 4GB of RAM, delivers a significantly more responsive experience, smoothly managing demanding applications, complex multitasking, and graphics-intensive games.
  • Storage Options: The iPhone SE (2016) was available with internal storage options up to 128GB. The iPhone XS offers more generous storage configurations, starting at 64GB and extending up to 512GB.
  • Battery Behavior: The iPhone SE (2016) houses a 1624 mAh battery. The iPhone XS comes with a larger 2658 mAh battery. The combination of a larger battery and a more power-efficient processor in the iPhone XS generally results in longer usage times between charges compared to the iPhone SE.

Memory

2 GB

4 GB

Screen quality

The visual experience on these two iPhones differs significantly due to advancements in display technology and design.

  • Display Technology and Clarity: The iPhone SE (2016) features a 4.0-inch IPS LCD Retina display with a resolution of 640 x 1136 pixels, resulting in a pixel density of 326 ppi. This provides clear visuals for its size. The iPhone XS, on the other hand, sports a 5.8-inch Super Retina OLED display with a higher resolution of 2436 x 1125 pixels and a pixel density of 458 ppi. The OLED technology in the XS delivers deeper blacks and more vibrant colors, and it supports HDR and Dolby Vision for enhanced contrast.
  • Brightness Levels: The iPhone SE (2016) offers a typical maximum brightness of 500 cd/m². The iPhone XS provides a brighter viewing experience with a typical maximum brightness of 625 cd/m², which can improve visibility in bright outdoor conditions.
  • Screen Size and Viewing Experience: The iPhone SE (2016) offers a compact form factor, ideal for one-handed use and easy pocketability. The iPhone XS provides a larger, more immersive display, better suited for media consumption and detailed content viewing.

Resolution

640 x 1136

1125 x 2436

Screen type

IPS LCD

Super Retina OLED

Audiovisual

The camera systems in the iPhone SE (2016) and iPhone XS showcase notable differences in their capabilities and features.

  • Camera System Capabilities: The iPhone SE (2016) is equipped with a single 12 MP rear camera with an f/2.2 aperture, capable of recording 4K video at 30 frames per second. Its front camera is 1.2 MP. The iPhone XS features a dual 12 MP rear camera system, including a wide-angle lens (f/1.8) and a telephoto lens (f/2.4), both benefiting from optical image stabilization. The front camera on the XS is 7 MP.
  • Photography Performance: The iPhone XS introduces advanced features like Smart HDR and an improved Portrait Mode with depth control, significantly enhancing image quality, especially in challenging lighting conditions and for creating professional-looking portraits. Its larger sensor and enhanced image signal processing contribute to better low-light performance compared to the iPhone SE.
  • Video Recording and Audio: While both can record 4K video, the iPhone XS offers more frame rate options, including 4K at 60 frames per second. The iPhone XS also supports stereo audio recording for video capture, providing a richer sound experience for recorded content. The iPhone SE (2016) has a single bottom-firing speaker, whereas the iPhone XS typically offers a stereo speaker setup for media consumption.

Main camera

12 megapixels

12 megapixels

Front camera

1.2 megapixels

7 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond core specifications, several practical elements differentiate the iPhone SE (2016) and iPhone XS, impacting daily usability.

  • Connectivity and Ports: Both devices support Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac and Bluetooth, with the iPhone SE (2016) using Bluetooth 4.2 and the iPhone XS featuring the newer Bluetooth 5.0 standard. Neither model supports 5G cellular connectivity. Both utilize a Lightning port for charging and data transfer. A notable difference is the presence of a 3.5mm headphone jack on the iPhone SE (2016), a feature absent from the iPhone XS.
  • Biometric Security: The iPhone SE (2016) employs Touch ID, a fingerprint sensor integrated into its physical home button, for secure authentication. The iPhone XS, moving to a more modern approach, uses Face ID, a facial recognition system for unlocking the device and authenticating purchases.
  • Physical Characteristics: The iPhone SE (2016) is considerably more compact and lighter, measuring 123.8 x 58.6 x 7.6 mm and weighing 113 grams. This makes it highly suitable for users who prefer a smaller device for one-handed operation and easy portability. The iPhone XS is larger and heavier, with dimensions of 143.6 x 70.9 x 7.7 mm and a weight of 177 grams.

Weight

4 oz

6 oz

Screen size (inches)

4

5.8

Network

LTE

LTE

SIM card

Physical SIM

Physical SIM + eSIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

Connector

Lightning + Jack 3.5mm

Lightning

User feedback for the iPhone SE (2016) often praises its compact size, making it comfortable for one-handed use and easy to carry. Many appreciated its performance relative to its small form factor at the time of its release. Criticisms frequently centered on its aging design and smaller screen size, which some users found limiting for media consumption and modern apps.

The iPhone XS, conversely, is frequently lauded for its significantly improved camera capabilities, particularly in low-light conditions and for portrait photography. Its vibrant OLED display and faster performance for demanding tasks also received positive remarks. Common criticisms included the absence of a headphone jack and its higher initial cost. Some users also reported initial issues with LTE, Wi-Fi, and Bluetooth connectivity, which were later addressed with software updates.

Users prioritizing a highly compact form factor, a physical home button with Touch ID, and who primarily use their phone for basic communication and lighter applications may find the iPhone SE (2016) well-suited to their needs. For those who value a larger, more immersive display, advanced camera features, robust performance for modern applications, and longer software support, the iPhone XS would be a more appropriate choice. Both devices offer a pathway to the Apple ecosystem, and considering a quality-assured refurbished option for either model can be an eco-friendly alternative.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons