iPhone 8 Plus • Unlocked vs iPhone SE (2016) • Unlocked

iPhone 8 Plus • Unlocked
iPhone 8 Plus • Unlocked
Starting at

Refurbished price:$122.00

Versus $239.00 new

See options
iPhone SE (2016) • Unlocked
iPhone SE (2016) • Unlocked
Starting at

Refurbished price:$70.00

Versus $219.00 new

See options

Ratings

The iPhone 8 Plus, released in September 2017, and the iPhone SE (2016), launched in March 2016, represent different eras and design philosophies within Apple's smartphone lineup. While both devices offer the core iOS experience, the iPhone 8 Plus provides a larger display, a more advanced camera system, and a more powerful internal architecture compared to the compact iPhone SE (2016).

Scores

Durability

When considering the longevity of these devices, their release timelines and subsequent software support are key factors. The iPhone 8 Plus, being a later model, benefits from a longer period of official iOS updates.

  • Release and Software Support: The iPhone 8 Plus was released in September 2017 and received major iOS updates up to iOS 16. It continues to receive security updates for iOS 16. In contrast, the iPhone SE (2016), launched in March 2016, supports up to iOS 15, with security updates still being provided for that version. This means the iPhone 8 Plus offers a slightly longer runway for accessing the latest iOS features and app compatibility.
  • Expected Practical Lifespan: Both devices, especially when considering a quality-assured refurbished option, can offer several more years of practical use for essential tasks. However, the iPhone 8 Plus's newer hardware and extended software support mean it will likely remain capable of running modern applications and receiving critical security patches for a longer duration than the iPhone SE (2016).
  • Repairability: Both models feature designs that allow for component replacement, contributing to their potential for extended use through repairs.

Release Year

2017

2016

Last OS Compatibility

No

No

OS

iOS

iOS

Foldable

No

No

Performance

The performance capabilities of these two iPhones differ significantly due to their respective release dates and internal components, impacting how smoothly they handle various tasks.

  • Processor Capabilities: The iPhone 8 Plus features a more advanced processor, which allows it to handle demanding applications, complex multitasking, and graphics-intensive games with greater fluidity. The iPhone SE (2016) utilizes an older generation processor, which, while capable for its time, will show more noticeable slowdowns with newer apps and heavier workloads.
  • Multitasking and Responsiveness: With more RAM, the iPhone 8 Plus offers a smoother experience when switching between multiple open applications and generally feels more responsive in daily use. The iPhone SE (2016) has less RAM, which can lead to apps reloading more frequently when multitasking.
  • Battery Behavior: The iPhone 8 Plus has a larger battery capacity, generally providing longer usage times on a single charge for typical users. The iPhone SE (2016), despite its smaller battery, was noted for its efficient battery life relative to its size and display, often lasting a full day for moderate users. However, with age, battery performance will naturally degrade on both models.

Memory

3 GB

2 GB

Screen quality

The display experience is a primary differentiator between the iPhone 8 Plus and the iPhone SE (2016), largely due to differences in size and display technology features.

  • Display Technology and Size: The iPhone 8 Plus features a larger 5.5-inch Retina HD LCD display, offering a more expansive viewing area suitable for media consumption and productivity. The iPhone SE (2016) has a compact 4-inch Retina LCD display, appealing to users who prefer a smaller form factor for one-handed use.
  • Resolution and Clarity: Both phones offer a pixel density that provides clear text and images for their respective screen sizes. The iPhone 8 Plus has a higher resolution (1920x1080) on its larger screen, while the iPhone SE (2016) maintains a sharp image on its smaller display (1136x640).
  • Brightness and Features: The iPhone 8 Plus offers higher typical brightness and includes True Tone technology, which automatically adjusts the display's white balance to match ambient light, providing a more natural viewing experience. The iPhone SE (2016) has a good brightness level for its class but lacks True Tone.

Resolution

1080 x 1920

640 x 1136

Screen type

Retina IPS LCD

IPS LCD

Audiovisual

The camera systems on the iPhone 8 Plus and iPhone SE (2016) offer distinct capabilities, particularly in terms of hardware and advanced features.

  • Rear Camera System: The iPhone 8 Plus boasts a dual 12-megapixel camera system, including a wide-angle and a telephoto lens. This setup enables features like Portrait Mode with Portrait Lighting, allowing for depth-of-field effects and studio-like lighting adjustments. The iPhone SE (2016) features a single 12-megapixel wide-angle camera, capable of capturing detailed photos in good lighting conditions.
  • Video Recording Quality: The iPhone 8 Plus supports 4K video recording at up to 60 frames per second, offering smoother and more detailed video capture. The iPhone SE (2016) can record 4K video at 30 frames per second.
  • Front Camera and Audio: The iPhone 8 Plus has a 7-megapixel front camera, providing higher resolution for selfies and video calls. The iPhone SE (2016) has a 1.2-megapixel front camera. Both devices offer decent microphone quality for calls and video recording, and their speakers are suitable for casual media consumption.

Main camera

12 megapixels

12 megapixels

Front camera

7 megapixels

1.2 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond core performance and display, several practical elements differentiate the user experience between the iPhone 8 Plus and the iPhone SE (2016).

  • Physical Design and Handling: The iPhone 8 Plus features a larger glass-and-aluminum design, weighing 202 grams, which provides a more substantial feel and a larger screen but can be less convenient for one-handed use. The iPhone SE (2016) retains the classic compact aluminum design, weighing 113 grams, making it significantly lighter and easier to handle with one hand and fit into smaller pockets.
  • Connectivity and Ports: Both devices utilize the Lightning port for charging and data transfer. The iPhone SE (2016) includes a 3.5mm headphone jack, a feature absent on the iPhone 8 Plus. The iPhone 8 Plus supports wireless charging and has an IP67 rating for water and dust resistance, features not present on the iPhone SE (2016).
  • Biometric Security: Both models feature Touch ID for secure authentication, integrated into the home button.

Weight

7 oz

4 oz

Screen size (inches)

5.5

4

Network

LTE

LTE

SIM card

Physical SIM

Physical SIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

Connector

Lightning

Lightning + Jack 3.5mm

User feedback for the iPhone 8 Plus often praises its robust performance, capable dual-camera system, and solid battery life, making it a reliable device for everyday tasks and photography. Some users, however, found its design with larger bezels to feel dated compared to contemporary devices at its release.

The iPhone SE (2016) is frequently lauded for its compact size, which many users appreciate for one-handed operation and pocketability. Its performance for its size and impressive battery life for a smaller device were also common points of praise. Criticisms often centered on its smaller screen size and the older design aesthetic.

Users prioritizing a larger screen, more advanced camera features like Portrait Mode, and a slightly longer period of software support may find the iPhone 8 Plus better suited to their needs. Its performance capabilities also make it a stronger choice for more demanding applications and multitasking. Conversely, individuals who value a highly compact form factor, ease of one-handed use, and the presence of a traditional headphone jack will likely prefer the iPhone SE (2016).

For those considering either of these models, exploring quality-assured refurbished options can provide an eco-friendly alternative to extend the life cycle of these capable devices.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons