Galaxy S23 FE • Unlocked vs Google Pixel 8 Pro • Unlocked

Galaxy S23 FE • Unlocked
Galaxy S23 FE • Unlocked
Starting at

Refurbished price:$205.00

Versus $799.00 new

See options
Google Pixel 8 Pro • Unlocked
Google Pixel 8 Pro • Unlocked
Starting at

Refurbished price:$296.00

Versus $899.99 new

See options

Ratings

The Samsung Galaxy S23 FE and the Google Pixel 8 Pro are both advanced smartphones released in October 2023, offering distinct approaches to the Android experience. While the Galaxy S23 FE, a Fan Edition model, aims to deliver a balanced flagship-like experience with Samsung's One UI, the Pixel 8 Pro emphasizes Google's pure Android vision, advanced computational photography, and AI-driven features. Both devices run on the Android operating system, with the Pixel 8 Pro launching with Android 14 and the S23 FE with Android 13, upgradable to Android 14.

Scores

Durability

When considering the long-term usability of these devices, their release timelines and software support policies are key factors.

  • Software Longevity: The Google Pixel 8 Pro stands out with an industry-leading commitment of seven years of OS upgrades, security updates, and regular Feature Drops, extending support until 2030. The Samsung Galaxy S23 FE offers a respectable four major OS updates and five years of security patches.
  • Repairability: The Samsung Galaxy S23 FE generally exhibits a higher repairability score, often rated around 8.0 to 8.5 out of 10, partly due to features like accessible battery pull tabs. In contrast, the Google Pixel 8 Pro has a lower repairability score, typically ranging from 4.0 to 5.5 out of 10, with challenges noted in battery access and a soldered charging port.
  • Practical Lifespan: Users prioritizing extended software support and the latest Android features for the longest possible duration will find the Pixel 8 Pro's seven-year commitment beneficial. For those who typically upgrade their device within five years, the Galaxy S23 FE's support policy remains robust.

Release Year

2023

2023

Last OS Compatibility

Yes

Yes

OS

Android

Android

Foldable

No

No

Performance

The performance of both smartphones is driven by their respective processors, impacting daily tasks, multitasking, and demanding applications.

  • Processor Capabilities: The Google Pixel 8 Pro features a current-generation processor designed by Google, which excels in AI-driven tasks and provides a smooth overall user experience. The Samsung Galaxy S23 FE is powered by a processor that was a top-tier option in the previous year, offering strong performance for most applications and gaming.
  • Multitasking and Responsiveness: The Pixel 8 Pro comes with 12GB of RAM, contributing to fluid multitasking and app management. The Galaxy S23 FE includes 8GB of RAM, which is sufficient for typical daily usage and switching between multiple applications.
  • Battery Behavior: The Pixel 8 Pro houses a 5050 mAh battery, while the Galaxy S23 FE has a 4500 mAh battery. User experiences with battery life vary for both devices; some Pixel 8 Pro users report good initial battery performance, though some note it can decrease over time or with heavy use. The Galaxy S23 FE generally offers a full day of use for many, with some users reporting around 5-6 hours of screen-on time.

Memory (GB)

8 GB

12 GB

Screen quality

The visual experience on both devices is delivered through their displays, each offering distinct characteristics.

  • Display Technology and Size: The Google Pixel 8 Pro features a larger 6.7-inch LTPO OLED display, which Google refers to as 'Super Actua'. The Samsung Galaxy S23 FE has a 6.4-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X display. Both technologies provide vibrant colors and deep blacks.
  • Resolution and Brightness: The Pixel 8 Pro offers a higher resolution of 2992x1344 pixels, resulting in a very sharp image, and boasts a peak brightness of up to 2400 nits, making it highly visible even in bright outdoor conditions. The Galaxy S23 FE provides a clear 2340x1080 pixel resolution and a peak brightness of 1450 nits, which is bright enough for most viewing environments.
  • Refresh Rate and Smoothness: Both phones feature a 120Hz adaptive refresh rate, contributing to smooth scrolling and responsive interactions. The Pixel 8 Pro's LTPO technology allows its refresh rate to scale down to 1Hz for improved power efficiency.

Resolution

1080 x 2340

1344 x 2992

Screen type

Dynamic AMOLED 2X

LTPO OLED

Audiovisual

Both smartphones offer capable camera systems, though they approach photography with different strengths.

  • Rear Camera System: The Google Pixel 8 Pro features a versatile triple camera setup including a 50MP main sensor with a wide aperture, a 48MP ultrawide lens, and a 48MP telephoto lens capable of 5x optical zoom. The Samsung Galaxy S23 FE also has a triple camera system with a 50MP main sensor, a 12MP ultrawide, and an 8MP telephoto lens offering 3x optical zoom.
  • Photography Performance: The Pixel 8 Pro is highly praised for its computational photography, delivering excellent image quality, particularly in low-light conditions, with accurate colors and strong detail. It also includes a Pro mode for manual controls. The Galaxy S23 FE provides very good photos, especially in bright lighting, and its Night Mode enhances low-light shots. Samsung's cameras can sometimes produce more saturated colors.
  • Video and Front Camera: The Pixel 8 Pro records video up to 4K at 60fps, and its 10.5MP front camera includes autofocus. The Galaxy S23 FE supports video recording up to 8K at 24fps and has a 10MP front camera.

Main camera

50 megapixels

50 megapixels

Front camera

10 megapixels

10.5 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond core performance and display, several practical elements differentiate these two devices.

  • Connectivity and Ports: Both phones support 5G connectivity and feature a USB Type-C port. The Pixel 8 Pro supports the newer Wi-Fi 7 standard, while the Galaxy S23 FE supports Wi-Fi 6E. Both include Bluetooth 5.3 and NFC.
  • Biometric Security: The Pixel 8 Pro offers both an under-display fingerprint scanner and Face Unlock, with its Face Unlock meeting high Android security standards. The Galaxy S23 FE features an optical under-display fingerprint sensor.
  • Build and Handling: The Pixel 8 Pro measures 162.6 x 76.5 x 8.8 mm and weighs 213 grams. The Galaxy S23 FE is slightly smaller and lighter at 158 x 76.5 x 8.2 mm and 209 grams. Both devices carry an IP68 rating for dust and water resistance, and the Pixel 8 Pro uses Gorilla Glass Victus 2 for display protection, while the S23 FE uses Gorilla Glass 5.

Weight

6 oz

7 oz

Screen size (inches)

6.1

6.7

Network

5G

5G

SIM card

Physical SIM

Physical SIM + eSIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

Connector

USB-C

USB-C

User feedback for the Google Pixel 8 Pro often highlights its exceptional camera capabilities, smooth software experience, and the convenience of its AI-powered features as major strengths. Some users, however, have noted concerns regarding potential heating during intensive tasks and inconsistent battery performance over time. For the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE, common praise points to its vibrant display, capable camera system with optical zoom, and overall balanced performance for daily use. Criticisms sometimes mention that the processor, while capable, might not match the latest flagships in raw power, and some users report average battery life, particularly with the Exynos variant.

Users prioritizing long-term software support, cutting-edge computational photography, and a pure Android experience with advanced AI features may find the Google Pixel 8 Pro well-suited to their needs. Its extended update policy offers significant future-proofing. Conversely, individuals who value a slightly more compact design, a strong overall multimedia experience, and a camera system with reliable optical zoom for varied scenarios might lean towards the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE. Both devices represent solid choices within the Android ecosystem, and opting for a quality-assured refurbished option can be a sustainable choice for either model.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons