Galaxy S9 • Unlocked vs iPhone XS • Unlocked

Galaxy S9 • Unlocked
Galaxy S9 • Unlocked
Starting at

Refurbished price:$127.99

Versus $399.00 new

See options
iPhone XS • Unlocked
iPhone XS • Unlocked
Starting at

Refurbished price:$140.00

Versus $459.00 new

See options

Ratings

The Samsung Galaxy S9, released in March 2018, and the iPhone Xs, launched in September 2018, represent flagship smartphones from their respective manufacturers during that era. While both devices offered premium experiences, they differed in their operating systems and core design philosophies. The Galaxy S9 runs on Android, providing a customizable user experience, whereas the iPhone Xs operates on Apple's iOS, known for its integrated ecosystem and streamlined interface. Key differentiators include their camera systems, display technologies, and biometric security methods.

Scores

Durability

When considering the practical lifespan of these devices, their release timelines and software support cycles are important factors.

  • Release Timeline: The Samsung Galaxy S9 was introduced in March 2018, while the iPhone Xs followed later in September 2018. This six-month difference means the iPhone Xs generally benefits from a slightly longer period of active software support.
  • OS Support Duration: The Galaxy S9 launched with Android 8.0 Oreo and received its final official operating system update to Android 10 (One UI 2.5) in late 2020. Security updates for the S9 series concluded in March 2022. In contrast, the iPhone Xs shipped with iOS 12 and received major iOS updates up to iOS 18, released in 2024. Its major OS support ended with the release of iOS 26 in September 2025, though security updates are anticipated to continue through late 2026.
  • Repairability: The Galaxy S9 received a repairability score of 4 out of 10 from iFixit, indicating challenges in repair due to its glass construction and strong adhesives, particularly for battery and display replacements. The iPhone X, a direct predecessor to the Xs with a similar design, generally scored higher in repairability, suggesting a somewhat more accessible internal design for service.

Release Year

2018

2018

Last OS Compatibility

No

Yes

OS

Android

iOS

Foldable

No

No

Performance

Both devices were equipped with powerful internal components for their time, designed to handle demanding applications and multitasking. However, their real-world performance characteristics varied.

  • Processor Capabilities: The Galaxy S9 utilized different processors depending on the region, with some markets receiving a processor that, in certain real-world usage scenarios, exhibited slower performance and less efficient power consumption compared to its counterpart. The iPhone Xs featured a processor known for its enhanced processing power, offering a noticeable speed improvement over its predecessor.
  • System Responsiveness: Users of the iPhone Xs generally experienced smooth operation and quick app loading, benefiting from the integrated hardware and software optimization. The Galaxy S9 provided a capable experience, though some users noted variations in responsiveness depending on the specific processor variant.
  • Storage and RAM: Both devices offered 4GB of RAM, which was sufficient for multitasking at the time of their release. The Galaxy S9 provided storage options of 64GB, 128GB, and 256GB, with the added flexibility of microSD card expansion up to 400GB. The iPhone Xs was available with 64GB, 256GB, or 512GB of internal storage, without an option for expansion.

Memory

4 GB

4 GB

Screen quality

The visual experience on both smartphones was a highlight, each featuring advanced display technologies for vibrant and clear imagery.

  • Display Technology: The Samsung Galaxy S9 featured a 5.8-inch Super AMOLED display, known for its deep blacks and vibrant color reproduction. The iPhone Xs also utilized a 5.8-inch Super Retina HD OLED display, offering similar benefits in contrast and color accuracy.
  • Resolution and Clarity: The Galaxy S9 boasted a WQHD+ resolution of 2960x1440 pixels, resulting in a high pixel density of 570 ppi, providing exceptionally sharp visuals. The iPhone Xs offered a resolution of 2436x1125 pixels, with a pixel density of 458 ppi, delivering clear and detailed images.
  • Brightness and Features: Both displays supported HDR10 for enhanced dynamic range in compatible content. The Galaxy S9 could reach a peak brightness of 864 nits, while the iPhone Xs had a typical maximum brightness of 625 nits. The iPhone Xs also included True Tone technology, which adjusts the display's white balance to match the ambient light.

Resolution

1440 x 2960

1125 x 2436

Screen type

Super AMOLED

Super Retina OLED

Audiovisual

Both devices offered advanced camera systems for their time, capable of capturing high-quality photos and videos, though with different approaches and features.

  • Rear Camera System: The Galaxy S9 featured a single 12MP Dual Pixel rear camera with a unique variable aperture (f/1.5-f/2.4), allowing it to adapt to different lighting conditions. It included Optical Image Stabilization (OIS). The iPhone Xs came with a dual 12MP camera system, comprising a wide-angle lens (f/1.8) and a telephoto lens (f/2.4), both with OIS, enabling 2x optical zoom.
  • Photography Features: The Galaxy S9 offered a Pro Mode for manual control over settings and the ability to save photos in RAW format. It also featured super slow-motion video recording at 960fps. The iPhone Xs introduced Smart HDR for improved dynamic range in photos and Portrait mode with Depth Control.
  • Video and Audio: Both phones were capable of recording 4K video at various frame rates (30/60fps). The iPhone Xs was notable for being among the first iPhones to record stereo audio for videos. The Galaxy S9 was praised for its low-light photography capabilities and its speaker quality.

Main camera

12 megapixels

12 megapixels

Front camera

8 megapixels

7 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond the core features, several practical elements contributed to the overall user experience and daily usability of these smartphones.

  • Connectivity and Ports: Both devices supported 4G LTE for mobile data and modern Wi-Fi standards. The iPhone Xs introduced Gigabit LTE for potentially faster cellular speeds and offered dual-SIM functionality via eSIM. The Galaxy S9 retained a 3.5mm headphone jack, which was absent on the iPhone Xs, requiring users to rely on wireless audio or a Lightning adapter. The Galaxy S9 used a USB-C port for charging and data transfer, while the iPhone Xs used Apple's proprietary Lightning connector.
  • Biometric Security: The Galaxy S9 offered multiple biometric options, including a fingerprint sensor conveniently located below the camera on the back, and an iris scanner. The iPhone Xs relied solely on Face ID, its advanced facial recognition system, for secure unlocking and authentication.
  • Build and Handling: The Galaxy S9 featured a design with curved sides and Gorilla Glass 5 on both the front and back, weighing 163g. The iPhone Xs had a stainless steel frame with glass on the front and back, weighing 177g. Both devices offered a premium in-hand feel, with the S9 being slightly lighter.

Weight

6 oz

6 oz

Screen size (inches)

5.8

5.8

Network

LTE

LTE

SIM card

Physical SIM

Physical SIM + eSIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

Connector

USB-C + Jack 3.5mm

Lightning

The Samsung Galaxy S9 and iPhone Xs, both released in 2018, offered distinct experiences tailored to their respective ecosystems. User feedback for the Galaxy S9 often highlighted its impressive Super AMOLED display, versatile camera with variable aperture, and the convenience of a headphone jack and expandable storage. Some criticisms pointed to the performance variations between processor models and its relatively short software support lifespan compared to its Apple counterpart. The iPhone Xs was frequently praised for its powerful processing capabilities, consistent software experience, and advanced Face ID system. Initial user concerns sometimes included the absence of a headphone jack and the lack of a dedicated night mode in its camera at launch.

Users prioritizing a highly customizable Android experience, expandable storage, and the traditional headphone jack may find the Galaxy S9 to be a suitable option. Its camera, particularly for low-light conditions, was also a strong point. Conversely, individuals who value a long software support timeline, a streamlined user interface, and robust facial recognition technology might lean towards the iPhone Xs. Its consistent performance and integrated ecosystem are often key decision factors. Both devices, while no longer receiving the latest software updates, continue to offer reliable functionality for everyday tasks. For those seeking a more sustainable and budget-conscious choice, quality-assured refurbished options for both the Galaxy S9 and iPhone Xs are readily available, providing an eco-friendly alternative to purchasing new devices.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons